Methodology · the five pillars and the rubric

How we score.

A deep dive on the rubric, the five pillars, the reviewer calibration, and the safeguards against bias. Suitable for sceptical HR directors, procurement teams, and anyone who needs to stand over the decision in writing.

The framework

Five pillars, one working day.

The Core Standard assesses five pillars across a realistic working-day scenario, each scored on a published, behaviourally-anchored rubric. A candidate’s overall band is not an average: it is the lowest pillar with a minimum floor, because hiring on an average hides the weakness that will cost you most.

  1. 01
    Under pressure

    Prioritisation

    Does the candidate recognise what matters most when everything is urgent? Can they say no to the right request at the right time?

  2. 02
    Signal & nuance

    Judgement

    Do they spot the risk buried in the meeting request, the conflict in the diary, the tone shift in the email? The unflashy work of noticing. Second-read, not first-glance.

  3. 03
    Tone & audience

    Communication

    Can they write with the voice of the principal? Concise, warm, and appropriate to the audience. Poor writing costs relationships.

  4. 04
    Plan to delivery

    Execution

    Do they close the loop? Do the actions get done to standard, on time, with evidence? Do they manage upward and across, or just react?

  5. 05
    Trust & proxy

    Partnership

    Do they work as a genuine partner, not just a pair of hands? Anticipating what the principal needs before it is asked, holding relationships and stakeholders on their behalf, and earning the trust to act in their name.

The rubric

Five bands, behaviourally anchored.

Each pillar is scored on a 0 to 100 benchmark against a published rubric, and each score maps to one of five behaviourally-anchored bands: Developing, Proficient, Strong, Distinctive, Exemplary. Each band is anchored to observable behaviours, not adjectives. A "Distinctive" on Prioritisation is not "was really good at prioritising." It is, specifically: re-sequenced the day without prompting when a new input arrived, held the principal’s agenda in mind when the obvious path would have solved the smaller problem, named the trade-off in writing rather than just picking one.

The behavioural anchors are identical for the employer edition and the candidate (Certified) edition at every level. The scenario changes, the rubric does not. A Level 2 Certified is directly comparable to a Level 2 employer report. For the process end to end, from commission to report, see how the assessment works.

Reviewer calibration

Every report is reviewed by an expert.

Every report is reviewed and signed off by Lily Shippen, across every stream. The rubric is co-authored with Emily Partridge, former EA Team Manager, and the reviewer pool recalibrates quarterly against a shared library of anchor responses. A sample of reports is double-reviewed for inter-rater reliability, and drift is corrected at the quarterly calibration.

Reviewers never see the candidate’s name, company, or CV during scoring. The assessment file is pseudonymised before it reaches the reviewer queue. The candidate is identified by level and scenario only.

Bias safeguards

What we actively suppress.

Name, age, and education. Stripped from the candidate’s submission before the reviewer sees it. The reviewer scores on what the candidate did, not on where they were educated or how their name reads.

Writing style. The rubric scores decisions, not prose quality. A well-reasoned bullet list at Distinctive band outscores a beautifully written paragraph that misses the call.

Time of day. Reviewers score in batches, not in sequence, so a reviewer’s third report of the morning is not compared to their eighth of the afternoon.

Accommodations. Candidates can self-certify a +25% time accommodation for neurodivergence, disability, or medical reasons at the pre-checkout stage. No diagnosis required. Reviewers do not see which reports had accommodation applied, and the final band is not adjusted down.

The modules

Why these modules, in this order.

The assessment is built from modules, not questions. Each module stress-tests a specific capability that our combined decades of hiring, placing, and reviewing EAs tell us is decisive at that level. Nothing is there to pad the time. The stack has been rebuilt twice since 2024 as the profession evolved.

The six core modules, Inbox Triage, Simultaneous Demands, Conflicting Priorities, Calendar Rebuild, Email Drafting, and Stakeholder Dilemma, are the immovable skills of the role. They run across every level and are recalibrated at each altitude: a Level 1 Inbox Triage is not a Level 3 Inbox Triage, even though both carry the same name. At Level 2 and Level 3 we add an AI Fluency probe, where candidates are asked to revise an AI-drafted output or describe how they would use AI for a specific task. At Level 3 we also add a Data Interpretation module: a KPI dashboard or a messy spreadsheet, with the brief to surface the three things the principal needs to know.

A short Mindset layer runs alongside the modules. Five questions, scored separately. Not a pass/fail layer, a qualitative overlay that tells the reviewer whether the candidate understands the role they are being hired into.

Download the methodology

A document you can send to HR or procurement.

A 12-page methodology PDF with the full rubric, behavioural anchors, reviewer calibration protocol, and bias-suppression measures. Drop your email and we will send it.

One email with the PDF. No follow-up marketing.